Judge refuses to toss out Gov. Perry’s case

Texas Gov. Rick Perry, second from left, flanked by his lawyers David Botsford, left, and Tony Buzbee, listens to special prosecutor Michael McCrum during Perry's pretrial hearing on felony abuse of power charges in the 390th District Court at the Blackwell-Thurman Criminal Justice Center, Thursday, Nov. 6, 2014, in Austin, Texas. An Austin grand jury indicted Perry in August. The charges stem from his carrying out a threat to veto state funding for public corruption prosecutors. (AP Photo/Pool)
Texas Gov. Rick Perry, second from left, flanked by his lawyers David Botsford, left, and Tony Buzbee, listens to special prosecutor Michael McCrum during Perry's pretrial hearing on felony abuse of power charges in the 390th District Court at the Blackwell-Thurman Criminal Justice Center, Thursday, Nov. 6, 2014, in Austin. (AP Photo/Pool)

AUSTIN (AP) — A Texas judge refused on Tuesday to quash on technicalities two criminal felony indictments for abuse of power against Gov. Rick Perry, ruling that the potentially embarrassing case against the possible 2016 presidential hopeful should proceed.

The governor’s defense team had sought to have the matter thrown out, arguing that the special prosecutor, Michael McCrum, wasn’t properly sworn in and some paperwork wasn’t correctly filed. But a written ruling from District Judge Bert Richardson, who like Perry is a Republican, sided with McCrum.

“This court concludes that Mr. McCrum’s authority was not voided by procedural irregularities,” Richardson wrote.

An Austin grand jury indicted Perry in August on charges of abuse of official power and coercion of a public servant. He’s accused of publicly threatening, then carrying out, a veto of state funding for public corruption prosecutors after the unit’s Democratic district attorney refused to resign following a drunken driving conviction.

Perry made his first court appearance Nov. 6. He calls the case a political witch hunt and says he’d issue the veto again.

His attorneys have also sought to have the charges against Perry dismissed on constitutional grounds, but Richardson has yet to have a hearing on that challenge and isn’t expected to rule on it for weeks.

The day before Richardson’s ruling, Perry’s defense team filed a 28-page brief asserting that the case shouldn’t continue because Perry’s actions were protected by the constitutional powers of his office. They also bristled at McCrum’s past suggestions that the governor wasn’t above the law in arguing that his fate should be decided by a jury — just like any criminal defendant.

“This invalid prosecution cannot go to trial — not because Governor Perry is above the law, but because everything he is accused of this case is absolutely protected,” the attorneys wrote Monday.

Perry didn’t seek re-election but is seriously considering a second White House run after his 2012 bid flamed out in a series of memorable gaffes. He said he may announce a decision by May or June.

Top national Republicans initially lined up to praise Perry and decry the criminal case against him, but they’ve been less vocal about their support as the case drags on.

In arguing that it should be tossed out because of technicalities, Perry’s lead attorney, Houston-based Tony Buzbee, had repeatedly cited the U.S. Constitution and said it should apply to all matters, no matter how small.

“If you’re going to take away someone’s freedom, it’s not too much to ask you follow the letter of the law,” Buzbee said in Richardson’s courtroom this month. “If we start picking and choosing which parts of the Constitution that we’re going to follow, that’s utter chaos. That’s anarchy.”

McCrum countered that he’d followed procedure and that a jury should decide the case. In court, the special prosecutor repeatedly referred to “Mr. Perry,” rather than calling him governor.

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

KXAN.com provides commenting to allow for constructive discussion on the stories we cover. In order to comment here, you acknowledge you have read and agreed to our Terms of Service. Users who violate these terms, including use of vulgar language or racial slurs, will be banned. If you see an inappropriate comment, please flag it for our moderators to review.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s